Throughout history, religion has been used to support
peoples’ pursuit of power. Leaders would use religious beliefs and the “views”
of God or another deity to manufacture support for an action, no matter how
moral or immoral. For example, John Edwards uses religious beliefs and The
Bible to justify the conversion of the Israelites. This is an immoral action because it is
taking away their religious freedom, and yet he receives support from the
Puritan community because of his connections to the will of God. In John Winthrop’s
Speech to the General Court in 1645 he used religion to corrupt the idea of
democracy in the minds of American people. This is not necessarily an immoral
action, but people who may have considered being democratic now will not
because Winthrop convinced them that it was against their religion. Thomas Jefferson
takes a similar approach when trying to convince the public to abolish the slaves
despite their so-called racial inferiority. Jefferson claims that his conclusion
of the Africans’ inferiority would “degrade a whole race of men from the rank
in the scale of beings which their Creator may perhaps have given them.”
(Jefferson 3). He connected his claims to religion and God, which would cause
people to support his motion of abolishing slavery and having the slaves be integrated
into society (but also segregating them). Therefore, these three power-seeking
leaders used religious meaning to coax support out of the general public to their
get the political position that they wanted.
Lily, you've got a some strong connections between the readings and the role of religion on American society, and well as strong feelings on religious practice, or at least the practice of these particular men. Would the sincerity of the belief matter at all? Can we ascertain the sincerity of religious belief through historical evidence alone?
ReplyDelete